Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Court of Nevada

Essay specific features

 

Issue:

History

 

Written by:

Esther R

 

Date added:

September 24, 2015

 

Level:

University

 

Grade:

A

 

No of pages / words:

3 / 610

 

Was viewed:

8835 times

 

Rating of current essay:

 
Essay content:

The detainee is only required to identify himself, and does not need to answer any other inquiries from the officer. Hiibel challenged his conviction based on the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the US Constitution. The Sixth Judicial District Court rejected his claim, the Supreme Court of Nevada affirmed this decision, and the case went to the US Supreme Court in March 2004...
displayed 300 characters

Custom written essay

All essays are written from scratch by professional writers according to your instructions and delivered to your email on time. Prices start from $10.99/page

Order custom paper

Full essays database

You get access to all the essays and can view as many of them as you like for as little as $28.95/month

Buy database access

Order custom writing paper now!

  • Your research paper is written
    by certified writers
  • Your requirements and targets are
    always met
  • You are able to control the progress
    of your writing assignment
  • You get a chance to become an
    excellent student!

Get a price guote

 
 

In a 5-4 decision, the US Supreme Court affirmed the Nevada Supreme Court’s judgment. Justice Kennedy delivered the majority opinion of the Court. In his opinion, he referenced several past cases which have also dealt with the scope and operation of various stop and identify statutes. In Brown v. Texas (1979), the Court had rejected a conviction for violating a Texas stop and identify statute, based on Fourth Amendment grounds...
displayed 300 characters

General issues of this essay:

Related essays:

x
Services