How does Rousseau's conception of ?the state of nature' differ from Hobbes'?
Essay specific features
April 14, 2013
No of pages / words:
6 / 1565
Rating of current essay:
The state of nature is a supposed state as opposed to an actual state in that it is believed that humans have always been a part of a structure which could be considered a society, bound by some form of social contract (although some have argued there was in fact a time when humans existed in a true state of nature)...
displayed 300 characters
Order custom writing paper now!
- Your research paper is written
by certified writers
- Your requirements and targets are
- You are able to control the progress
of your writing assignment
- You get a chance to become an
Get a price guote
The argument put forward by Hobbes is hypothetical and does not base itself on any historical evidence of such a state having ever been occupied by humanity.
Philosophers attempted to evaluate and appraise the ?state of nature' did so due to the belief that through anaylsing and observing the ?original' state of human nature, hypothetical or otherwise, it is possible to improve understanding of society itself, and as a result ascertain a superior, enhanced and further advanced society
In the 18th century, philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778) disputed the conception of the ?state of nature' put forward by Hobbes in the 17th century...
displayed next 300 characters
General issues of this essay:
1 pages, 11 words
2 pages, 379 words
2 pages, 312 words
1 pages, 134 words
2 pages, 428 words
4 pages, 1073 words
4 pages, 914 words