Case Analysis: Wittenburg v. AMEX

Essay specific features

 

Issue:

Social Issues

 

Written by:

Russell W

 

Date added:

March 31, 2012

 

Level:

University

 

Grade:

 

No of pages / words:

2 / 453

 

Was viewed:

9692 times

 

Rating of current essay:

 
Essay content:

During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender...
displayed 300 characters

Custom written essay

All essays are written from scratch by professional writers according to your instructions and delivered to your email on time. Prices start from $10.99/page

Order custom paper

Full essays database

You get access to all the essays and can view as many of them as you like for as little as $28.95/month

Buy database access

Order custom writing paper now!

  • Your research paper is written
    by certified writers
  • Your requirements and targets are
    always met
  • You are able to control the progress
    of your writing assignment
  • You get a chance to become an
    excellent student!

Get a price guote

 
 

The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment. LAWS BEING APPLIED: The plaintiff is arguing claims of: • Age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act • Gender discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act • Gender and age discrimination under the Minnesota Human Rights Act ISSUES FACING THE COURT: • Was the plaintiff discriminated against on the basis of her age? • Was the plaintiff discriminated against on the basis of her gender? • Was the plaintiff retaliated against as a result of pursuing legal action? RESOLUTION: The court granted AEFA’s motion for a summary judgment for several reasons...
displayed 300 characters

General issues of this essay:

Related essays:

x
Services